More information and purchase

This volume poses the question of why Christian Aristotelianism has been cancelled from the modern era in the historiography of philosophy. In six chapters on theoretical philosophy – centred around the main figures Suárez, Vázquez, Ruiz de Montoya, Arriaga and Izquierdo – the scandal is explained by the delay with which philosophical medieval studies discovered the 14th century for itself. Catholic innovations of the 16th century – the subject matter of the two chapters on practical philosophy – convey an idea of the extent of the ignorance that is an effect of the modern legend. In the age of the witch trials, the so-called Jesuit morality corroded the belief in torture, and the West owes sexual self-determination to the so-called Jesuit morality. Finally, it is argued that talk of a ‘philosophy of the modern age’ and its contrast to the ‘Middle Ages’ should be regarded merely as a relic of the Kulturkampf.


Contents

  • Einleitung Jesuit und Neuzeit
  • Kapitel 1 Meinungsfreiheit? Der Aristotelismus und das Fürwahrhalten unter Willensbeteiligung in der lateinischen Tradition bis 1679
  • Kapitel 2 Vázquez oder die Perception Theory of Judgment
  • Kapitel 3 Suárez, oder Das Cogito und die Krise des Schulbegriffs der Reflexion
  • Kapitel 4 Izquierdo und die Zeitlichkeit des Bewußtseins
  • Kapitel 5 Arriaga oder der Psychologismus als ontologische Option
  • Kapitel 6 Ruiz de Montoya oder die Erfindung des metaphysischen Optimismus
  • Kapitel 7 Spee oder Naturrecht, Folter, Selbstverzicht
  • Kapitel 8 Puella est domina sui corporis. Sexuelle Selbstbestimmung in der Theologie um 1600